Its obvious that they industry will grow in the public sector as its needed for national defense. In the end we are left with a cyber security in a rather interesting scenario. Over +300 cyber security startups form every year and can gather massive private funding without gathering much market share.
However, others argue that due to the essential need for security in part stated above by the DHS, that it is more likely that the current atmosphere has produced an over saturation of overvalued startups. Those same companies have been able to regain their market share and improved cyber security hasn’t seemed to show a change in attack relevance. In part this is due to the fact that while cyber-attacks have been occurring more frequently and to higher profile companies. Some feel that this may lead to the market being in a bubble.
Spending on cyber security related developments and companies is on track to reach $133 billion by 2022 growing 30x in 13 years. On the private side of the spectrum the market seems to be fully aware of the need for cyber security professionals. The hope for this official would be a system in which government via scholarships and grants would foster the development of such professionals of whom would work in government for a few years before making the leap to the private sector. They also plan to invest in newer methods for obtaining and retaining those cyber security professionals that already exist. According to the official they are currently working ways to invest in the youth via the school curriculum. To this end the department of homeland security claims to already planning out steps to alleviate this. Recently, one senior official of the department of homeland security noted the lack of cyber security professionals in the US is a national security risk. On the other end improved technology and automation has made many of our systems fully operable online like some municipal systems and our electric systems. On one end this is due to the massive amount of data about us that is online ranging from the information that we share on our Facebook or Instagram to information governments or companies have about us. We’ll be using the skills of the journalists we employ to understand the five big topics we aim to focus upon.In today’s world the role of cyber security is emerging as a industry of paramount importance. He added: “Unherd won’t be following hourly, daily or even weekly developments closely. Montgomerie, who also worked as comment editor at the Times, told Press Gazette in April last year that Unherd journalists “will be given the time and will possess the skills to dive deeply into their subject areas” and “challenge out-of-date, incorrect and even dangerous thinking”.
Montgomerie tweeted: “The aim of building a site where diverse and neglected voices gather is a noble one.” Former Daily Telegraph journalist Sally Chatterton is currently listed as the site’s editor. The website looks set to continue on as Montgomerie wished his team “every success in the months ahead”. He was editor of the site when it launched last year with up to 15 full-time journalists. Montgomerie tweeted this morning that he had “recently resigned” from Unherd. Former Times columnist Tim Montgomerie has resigned from Unherd, the alternative news website he founded last year to offer readers a “deep dive” on global politics and other topics.